Hollywood vs. Reality

By
Most of us have watched, or are regular fans of shows such as CSI,Criminal Minds, and Law & Order, to name a few.  We witness them solve crime over the course of an hour.  But can we trust everything we see and put it to work in our books?  

It's so vitally important that as writers we get our facts straight.  If we don't, we may lose our readers for good.  I'm reading a non-fiction book called The Criminal Mind by Katherine Ramsland, Ph.D.  She makes reference to a certain published writer who didn't bother to check their facts.  Not only was she turned off from reading what she started, she would never read another of their books.  And, as I'm sure you're filling in right now, this author's lack of fact-checking didn't make for good publicity in the longterm.  And even though, I found myself cringing in empathy for this writer, at the same time it drove home the importance of presenting the facts.

Below are some contrasts between Hollywood and real life.  I know there are a lot more, and I hope this opens up a discussion.  Please note, in this post Hollywood refers to not only television and movies, but also to published written works.

In Hollywood:
Full toxicology panels come back within hours
In real life:
This process, dependent on how backed up a lab is, can take anywhere from a few days to a full week.  As a side note, smaller communities send forensic evidence to a larger centre for further analysis.

In Hollywood:
A lead detective or CSI will touch a potentially key piece of evidence with their bare hands.
In real life:
CSIs or Detectives would never risk tainting a crime scene.  Gloves are worn and any experienced officer would never touch anything at the crime scene, or associated with the crime, with his bare hands.  Next time you watch one of these investigative shows, keep an eye out for this.  It’s interesting how many times it actually happens.

In Hollywood:
The lead detective has a gut feeling, based on relatively nothing at all.
In real life:
“Gut feelings” are pulled from years of experience, and founded on evidence, and do not result from magical moments of divine insight.

In Hollywood:
The lead detective or investigator pictures what happened, fabricating “what could have happened” in their minds.
In real life:
Hypotheses are drawn from evidence, based on facts, not imagination.

In Hollywood:
Criminal psychologists go to the crime scene and take an active part in the investigation.
In real life:
Criminal psychologists never visit the crime scene.  What they do is study the facts in a case, who the victim was, where they were last seen, details of the scene and other such details and build a profile.

In Hollywood:
To catch the criminal you have to think like one.
In real life:
If that were the case, psychologists would solve all cases by their magical ability to figure people out and make them say what they don't want to.

Comments

  1. Tara TylerMarch 12, 2011 at 5:47 PM

    Good post. I don't know why I like those shows when they do seem to wrap everything up so quickly and easily! Medical dramas are the same way...

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownMarch 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM

    Great post, Carolyn. Luckily I had an ex-NYPD detective who is now with the DEA to bounce things off of when I wrote my first book. He made a point of letting me know the difference of what the T.V. shows did and how the real NYPD handles a case. (CSU does not go to every crime scene, and lab techs, not detectives, handle all the evidence.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Carolyn ArnoldMarch 13, 2011 at 3:31 PM

    Thank you guys. Tara, your comment about medical dramas makes me think of the show House.

    Ken, very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousMay 2, 2012 at 7:01 AM

    So true. Of course, on TV they have to wrap it up within the hour....! LOL! Great article, Carolyn.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to make a comment.

Popular posts from this blog

When Family Doesn't Support Your Writing

By
If you can empathize with the title of this post, then you're not alone.  So many writers, myself included, can honestly say they have family members who don't support their writing.  Some may go so far as to tell you they don't even want to hear about what you're working on, what you've done, what your goals are.  That hurts. But think about it this way, in some ways is writing any different that an other life decisions your family may not agree with?  I'm sure, if you're like me, you get very defensive when it comes to your writing.  In fact, I'm not going to deny that it places an iron wedge in the relationships.  After all, if your focus in life is your writing, and they ask so what have you been up to ...what are you supposed to do lie, remain quiet, answer another way even though you're so excited about your current WIP you'd tell a stranger?  Ticking clocks are heard in the background while you decide.
Read more

A Big Decision...

By
Image
For those of you who know me, and follow me on Twitter, you may be aware that I’ve been debating whether to pursue publishing traditionally, or take the plunge and self-publish.  With all the “buzz” on the internet, and after great consideration, I have decided to go ahead and self-publish. I had asked myself, does this mean I’m giving up ?  And, the answer is irrevocably no.  Self-publishing used to carry a type of stigma that somehow labelled the work as adhering to a lower standard, but things have changed.  Authors are taking pride in their work like never before, and just because of the increasing ease to self-publishing, they’re not allowing this to affect the quality. In making my decision, I also considered the fact that just because a book is published traditionally it doesn’t mean that it will meet with success.  Many self-published books have received awards, honourable mentions, and have met with even more-than-modest sales.  In fact, there’s ...
Read more

Write What You Love

By
We've all heard the advice, write what you know.  There's been a lot of debate over this piece of advice.  Some see it as valid direction while others argue that there wouldn't be any books if we just wrote what we know.  For example, how many mystery novels are written by real-life detectives?  And, I guess that advice is null when it comes to fantasy genres, and historical fictional works.  No fairy from Neverland wrote a book, and no one from over a hundred years ago can write a book currently.   But, this doesn't mean that we can get sloppy, in fact more work is involved, and this is why writing what we love supersedes all, in my opinion.  How else would we get motivated, and stay motivated to see a novel through to the end? In fact isn't it love for what we’re writing what pushes us through to the conclusion even when we may find the interest in our book weaning, or through the rough middles?  Isn't it the love for what we're writing that f...
Read more